@article{custodioGeneralistsSpecialistsLifetime2012,
  title = {Generalists versus {{Specialists}}: {{Lifetime Work Experience}} and {{CEO Pay}}},
  shorttitle = {Generalists versus {{Specialists}}},
  author = {Custodio, Claudia and Ferreira, Miguel A. and Matos, Pedro P.},
  date = {2012},
  journaltitle = {SSRN Electronic Journal},
  shortjournal = {SSRN Journal},
  issn = {1556-5068},
  doi = {10.2139/ssrn.1785943},
  url = {http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=1785943},
  urldate = {2022-08-26},
  abstract = {We show that pay is higher for CEOs with general managerial skills gathered during lifetime work experience. We use CEOs’ résumés of S\&P 1,500 firms from 1993 through 2007 to construct an index of general skills that are transferable across firms and industries. We estimate an annual pay premium for generalist CEOs—those with an index value above the median—of 19\% relative to specialist CEOs, which represents nearly a million dollars per year. This relation is robust to the inclusion of firm- and CEO-level controls, including fixed effects. CEO pay increases the most when firms externally hire a new CEO and switch from a specialist to a generalist CEO. Furthermore, the pay premium is higher when CEOs are hired to perform complex tasks such as restructurings and acquisitions. Our findings provide direct evidence of the increased importance of general managerial skills over firm-specific human capital in the market for CEOs in the last decades.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Users/kevin/Zotero/storage/CZN6RFZM/Custodio et al. - 2012 - Generalists versus Specialists Lifetime Work Expe.pdf}
}

@article{judgeNiceGuysGals2012,
  title = {Do Nice Guys—and Gals—Really Finish Last? {{The}} Joint Effects of Sex and Agreeableness on Income.},
  shorttitle = {Do Nice Guys—and Gals—Really Finish Last?},
  author = {Judge, Timothy A. and Livingston, Beth A. and Hurst, Charlice},
  date = {2012},
  journaltitle = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
  shortjournal = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
  volume = {102},
  number = {2},
  pages = {390--407},
  issn = {1939-1315, 0022-3514},
  doi = {10.1037/a0026021},
  url = {http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0026021},
  urldate = {2022-08-26},
  abstract = {Sex and agreeableness were hypothesized to affect income, such that women and agreeable individuals were hypothesized to earn less than men and less agreeable individuals. Because agreeable men disconfirm (and disagreeable men confirm) conventional gender roles, agreeableness was expected to be more negatively related to income for men (i.e., the pay gap between agreeable men and agreeable women would be smaller than the gap between disagreeable men and disagreeable women). The hypotheses were supported across 4 studies. Study 1 confirmed the effects of sex and agreeableness on income and that the agreeableness–income relationship was significantly more negative for men than for women. Study 2 replicated these results, controlling for each of the other Big Five traits. Study 3 also replicated the interaction and explored explanations and paradoxes of the relationship. A 4th study, using an experimental design, yielded evidence for the argument that the joint effects of agreeableness and gender are due to backlash against agreeable men.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Users/kevin/Zotero/storage/NQH9JJI2/Judge et al. - 2012 - Do nice guys—and gals—really finish last The join.pdf}
}

@article{mackaveyRememberingAutobiographicallyConsequential19910701,
  title = {Remembering Autobiographically Consequential Experiences: {{Content}} Analysis of Psychologists' Accounts of Their Lives.},
  shorttitle = {Remembering Autobiographically Consequential Experiences},
  author = {Mackavey, William R. and Malley, Janet E. and Stewart, Abigail J.},
  date = {19910701},
  journaltitle = {Psychology and Aging},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {50},
  publisher = {{US: American Psychological Association}},
  issn = {1939-1498},
  doi = {10.1037/0882-7974.6.1.50},
  url = {https://psycnet.apa.80599.net/fulltext/1991-17995-001.pdf},
  urldate = {2022-08-26},
  file = {/Users/kevin/Zotero/storage/HG5RLFCL/Mackavey et al. - Remembering autobiographically consequential exper.pdf}
}

@article{quoidbachEndHistoryIllusion2013,
  title = {The {{End}} of {{History Illusion}}},
  author = {Quoidbach, Jordi and Gilbert, Daniel T. and Wilson, Timothy D.},
  date = {2013-01-04},
  journaltitle = {Science},
  shortjournal = {Science},
  volume = {339},
  number = {6115},
  pages = {96--98},
  issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
  doi = {10.1126/science.1229294},
  url = {https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1229294},
  urldate = {2022-08-26},
  abstract = {Older and Wiser                            Do we ever stop growing up?                                Quoidbach                 et al.                              (p.               96               ) elicited estimates of people's personality, values, and choices and compared how much, for instance, 33-year-olds believed that they would change in the next 10 years with how much 43-year-olds reported that they had changed in the past 10 years. For groups spanning 18 to 68 years of age, people of all ages described more change in the past 10 years than they would have predicted 10 years ago.                        ,              Even though we know that we've changed over the years, we believe, mistakenly, that we won't change much in the future.           ,              We measured the personalities, values, and preferences of more than 19,000 people who ranged in age from 18 to 68 and asked them to report how much they had changed in the past decade and/or to predict how much they would change in the next decade. Young people, middle-aged people, and older people all believed they had changed a lot in the past but would change relatively little in the future. People, it seems, regard the present as a watershed moment at which they have finally become the person they will be for the rest of their lives. This “end of history illusion” had practical consequences, leading people to overpay for future opportunities to indulge their current preferences.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Users/kevin/Zotero/storage/69N8RC3V/Quoidbach et al. - 2013 - The End of History Illusion.pdf}
}

@article{vercicGenericCharismaConceptualization2011,
  title = {Generic Charisma – {{Conceptualization}} and Measurement},
  author = {Verčič, Ana Tkalac and Verčič, Dejan},
  date = {2011-03},
  journaltitle = {Public Relations Review},
  shortjournal = {Public Relations Review},
  volume = {37},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12--19},
  issn = {03638111},
  doi = {10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.002},
  url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0363811110001293},
  urldate = {2023-12-22},
  abstract = {In these times, when fame is available to almost anyone, it is worth being able to measure the extent and dimensions of a person’s charisma. Most of the research on charisma to date is restricted to the area of leadership. In this article, however, charisma is generalized to take in all human beings and is conceptualized as a multi-dimensional cognitive-affective phenomenon. The article presents a pilot study aimed at providing an adequate operational definition of the construct as well as an initial tool for its measurement. A following literature review shows how authors have developed the concept of charisma and its initial operational dimensions for empirical research. A questionnaire is developed in three stages. The factor analyses applied in stages two and three point towards a six-factor solution (i.e. six dimensions of charisma). Further analysis reveals that the developed instrument is reliable and viable as well as applicable for future theoretical and practical work.},
  langid = {english},
  file = {/Users/kevin/Zotero/storage/4LMXIX3V/Verčič and Verčič - 2011 - Generic charisma – Conceptualization and measureme.pdf}
}
